Bunched and Madm: a novel growth-regulatory complex?

By combining Drosophila genetics and proteomics Gluderer et al. report in this issue of Journal of Biology the isolation of a novel growth-regulatory complex consisting of Bunched and Madm. Future study of this complex will address the precise mechanism of growth control, regulation of complex activity, the interface with other growth pathways and a potential role in human cancer. See research article at http://jbiol.com/content/9/1/9.


Flies and cancer
Drosophila melanogaster has proved to be a very valuable organism for the discovery of novel signaling proteins and pathways that control various biological processes. A major tool in the armory of Drosophila biologists has been forward genetic screens. Over time, many different mutation and screening strategies have been used by Drosophila biologists, with great success. One such screen ing approach, the so-called Flp recombinase/Flp recombinase target (Flp/FRT) clonal screen, has facilitated the discovery of many new growth regulators by several laboratories, predominantly in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Essentially, the Flp/FRT technique allows the creation of patches of homozygous mutant tissue in a heterozygous animal. Thus, growth-regulatory genes that normally cause pre-adult lethality when homozygous were recovered using such screens.
Subsequently, many of the human homologs of genes that regulate growth in Drosophila were linked to the genesis of human cancers. These included several regulators of the insulin and Target of rapamycin (TOR) pathways [2], the ubiquitin ligase Archipelago (Ago) [3] and a novel signaling pathway, the Salvador/Warts/Hippo (SWH) pathway [4,5]. Deregulation of the insulin and TOR pathways has well described links to human cancer; for example, PTEN, which represses activity of the insulin pathway, is one of the most commonly mutated human tumor suppressor genes. Following its discovery in 2001, the human ortholog of Ago has been shown to be mutated at varying frequencies in a wide range of human cancers, including ovarian cancer, colon cancer and T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [6]. Several lines of evidence have also linked altered activity of different SWH pathway components to human cancer, although the degree to which deregulation of this pathway contributes to the genesis of different human cancers is still being determined [5].
suppressors and genes required to promote growth. Two such growth-promoting genes were bunched (bun) and Mlf1 adapter molecule (Madm), which were isolated based on the fact that tissue harbouring mutations in these genes exhibited a growth deficiency [7,8]. The mechanism of action and function of neither gene has been well characterized in flies or mammals. Bun is a putative transcription factor that influences Drosophila oogenesis and nervous system development. There are four mammalian bun homologs, one of which, Trans forming growth factorβstimulated clone 22 (TSC22D1), has been hypothesized to be a tumor suppressor gene from its ability to repress growth and survival of cultured cells [9]. However, its precise function, and that of its three homologs, has not been well characterized in vivo in mammals. The bun gene encodes variant gene products, and only the long Bun proteins (such as BunA) seem to promote growth, whereas shorter isoforms have been shown to antagonize longer Bun isoforms [7,10]. Although Madm was first isolated using its ability to bind the Myeloid leukemia factor 1 (Mlf1) oncoprotein [11], the work by Gluderer et al. in this issue of Journal of Biology [8] is the first in vivo functional study of Madm.
The findings of Gluderer et al. [8] suggest that Bun and Madm form a novel growth-controlling complex ( Figure 1). Their work [8] highlights the power of combining multiple experimental approaches (in this case genetics and biochemistry) to elucidate protein function. Madm was isolated as a BunA-interacting partner by affinity purification and mass spectrometry, and, in parallel, it was isolated in the above-described Flp/FRT growth screen. The combined approach provided complementary validation for the function of Madm and also provided a hint at mechanism: that Bun and Madm control growth tissue growth in partnership. They appear to do so in an obligate fashion as overexpression of both bun and Madm is required to induce tissue overgrowth [8]. The major challenges arising from this discovery are to define the mechanism by which BunA and Madm promote growth and to explore the role of their mammalian homologs in normal tissue growth and in cancer.

Possible mechanisms of action of the BunA-Madm complex
Gluderer et al. have proposed a number of possible mechanisms by which BunA and Madm promote tissue growth [8]. One possibility is that BunA and Madm are components of an existing growth-regulatory pathway. Tissues lacking bun or Madm show some similarities to the phenotypic characteristics of tissues with compromised insulin or TOR pathway activity, such as small cell size and reduced cell number [7,8]. However, Gluderer et al. previously showed [7] that bun is unlikely to control insulin or TOR pathway activity. Alternatively, BunA and Madm might constitute a novel growth-promoting pathway. If this is the case, an obvious question is how a Bun/ Madm pathway would interface with other growth pathways to coordinately modulate tissue growth, particularly during development, when patterning cues and nutrient signals need to be orchestrated to specify organ and organism size.
The exact molecular steps by which BunA and Madm promote tissue growth also remain mysterious. Bun has been proposed to be a transcription factor and therefore might stimulate expression of a growth-promoting transcriptional program, but so far no such target genes have been identified. Loss-of-function mutations in bun were Growth genes? Protein secretion recovered lacking the carboxyl terminus, which includes the DNA-binding TSC box of BunA and the leucine zipper [7]. To establish whether BunA-mediated transcrip tion is essential for BunA-Madm to drive growth, it would be desirable to determine whether a BunA protein that is incapable of binding DNA as a result of TSC-box missense mutations that abrogate DNA binding can rescue bun deficiency.
Another possibility is that the BunA-Madm complex regulates protein secretion. BunA and Madm both localize to the Golgi, and Madm has been shown to affect transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi [8,12]. In addition, RNAi-mediated repression of either Madm or bun was found to inhibit protein secretion in cultured cells [13], although it is unclear whether BunA and Madm regulate secretion in a cooperative manner. It is also unclear whether the ability of BunA and Madm to control protein secretion is linked to their role as regulators of tissue growth.

Regulation of the Bun-Madm complex
The regulation of BunA and Madm is another important outstanding issue that will need to be addressed in future studies. For example, it will be important to identify the proteins that function upstream and downstream of BunA-Madm, as well any potential transmembrane receptor proteins regulating their activity (Figure 1). A common feature of the regulation of all known signaling pathways is phosphorylation. BunA is phosphorylated in a conserved amino-terminal domain [14] and this is likely to modulate its activity. Identification of kinases and phosphatases that regulate BunA, and examination of a role for Madm in mediating BunA phosphorylation, should shed light on the regulation of growth by these proteins. Madm has been postulated to regulate the activity of Mlf1 by controlling its nuclear access [11] and may exert similar control over BunA. However, so far no evidence of nuclear localization of BunA has been found [8].
Transcriptional control of the bun gene offers another potential mode of regulation of the BunA-Madm complex. In cultured mammalian cells, TSC22D1 transcription is controlled by TGFβ [15], but it is unclear whether this mode of transcriptional control is conserved for bun genes across diverse species. In addition, as described by Gluderer et al. [8], the bun locus gives rise to long and short Bun proteins and the short Bun proteins have been shown to antagonize the longer isoforms, possibly by heterodimerization and subsequent disruption of growth-promoting BunA complexes [7]. Modulation of bun transcription under utilization of different promoters that yield discrete Bun isoforms might therefore modulate the net growth-regulatory output of the bun locus.

Mammalian Bun and Madm homologs and cancer
There is a high degree of conservation between growth control programs that function in flies and in mammals. A major unresolved question regarding the Bun-Madm growth control complex is whether deregulation of their human homologs contributes to the genesis of cancer. The short isoform of TSC22D1 was initially hypothesized to be a tumor suppressor [9], but the growth-regulatory role of long TSC-22 isoforms and of Madm in mammals remains unresolved. Assuming that the function of BunA and Madm is conserved between flies and mammals, the loss of Madm or of one of the four TSC22 family genes might be expected to impair tissue growth and therefore not to be tumor-promoting. In addition, given that genetic studies in Drosophila have shown that BunA and Madm promote growth in an obligate partnership, human homologs of both genes would need to be overexpressed or amplified in order to promote tumorigenesis, which is unlikely to be a common event. The most likely tumorpromoting effect of this complex might be reduced expression of short isoforms of the TSC22 gene family, which might alleviate TSC-22-Madm repression. While these possibilities are being investigated in mammalian cells, studies in Drosophila are likely to continue to lead the way in unraveling the mechanism by which the newly identified Bun-Madm complex controls tissue growth.